Segundo o
artigo ha 3 fatores que podem medir se voce tem o que he necessario para ser
bem sucedido com empresario. Muito pertinente e preciso, como sempre, esse
blog.
Algumas
pessoas tem 1 fator, outras 2, outras nem um nem outro...outras tem os 3, mas estão
na hora/lugar errados ou não tem ‘conhecimento’ para administrar uma empresa e
por ai vai. E você caro empresário, tem os 3 itens na mao?
E depois do
sucesso? Você pira a cabecinha e volta a fazer besteira?
Quem puder,
traduza-o.
The “Breaking Bad” school
The best show on television is also a
first-rate primer on business
THERE are obvious reasons for watching
“Breaking Bad”: for once the Hollywood hype
surrounding the television series is justified. But there is also a less
obvious reason: it is one of the best studies available of the dynamics of
modern business. A Harvard MBA will set you back $90,000 (plus two years’ lost
income). You can buy a deluxe edition of all five seasons of “Breaking Bad”,
complete with a plastic money barrel, for $209.99, or a regular edition for
less than $80.
“Breaking Bad”, whose
finale airs on September 29th, takes place in a recession-ravaged America where
most people are struggling to get by on stagnant incomes but a handful of
entrepreneurs live like kings. The hero, Walter White, is a high-school
chemistry teacher with a second job in a car wash. When he is diagnosed with
cancer he is also shaken out of his lethargy: he decides to go into the highly
lucrative methamphetamine business to pay for his cancer treatment and leave
his family a nest-egg.
The first lesson from
“Breaking Bad” is that high-growth businesses come from unexpected places. Mr
White uses his skills as a chemist to revolutionise the slapdash meth industry
(he was a researcher before becoming a teacher). He is not alone. William
Thorndike of Harvard Business School (HBS) studied eight bosses whose firms
outperformed the S&P 500 index more than 20-fold over their business
careers. He found that they were all outsiders who brought fresh perspectives
on their industries. Clayton Christensen, also at HBS, argues that great entrepreneurs
look at the world through a “marginal lens”. It so happens that Bill Gates, a
university drop-out working in a then marginal bit of the computer industry,
started Microsoft in Mr White’s home-town, Albuquerque ,
before moving to Seattle .
Three things help our
chemistry teacher turn an insight into a flourishing business. The first is
huge ambition. He is not in the “meth business” or the “money business”, he
says. He is in the “empire business”. The second is product obsession. Other
dealers might peddle “Mexican shoe-scrapings” on the ground that addicts care
little about quality. He produces the king of meth, so pure that it turns blue,
and would rather destroy an entire batch than let an inferior product be traded
under his brand. The third is partnerships and alliances. He spots talent in a
former pupil turned drug-dealer, Jesse Pinkman, and forms a strong working
relationship with him. He also contracts distribution to a succession of local
gangs so that he can concentrate on the higher-value-added part of the
business: cooking and quality control.
Again Mr White is not
alone. There is a reason people talk of business empires: tycoons like Rupert
Murdoch are latter-day Caesars, fixated on conquering new territories. Steve
Jobs eventually outcompeted Microsoft because he was so painstaking in
perfecting Apple’s products. Partnerships are the heart of a striking number of
businesses: whether Larry Page and Sergey Brin or Warren Buffett and Charlie
Munger—or indeed Goldman and Sachs or Hewlett and Packard. As for contracting
out distribution, it is de rigueur for high-growth start-ups.
“Breaking Bad” is even
sharper on the forces of destruction in business. Mr White’s relationship with
his partner falls apart. He is regularly in conflict with his distributors. And
he sucks at work-life balance. Being in the meth business gives a unique twist
to all these problems. His relationship with his partner is shattered by his
leaving one of Mr Pinkman’s girlfriends to die of an overdose and poisoning a
subsequent girlfriend’s son. His relationship with his best distributor is
undermined by the man’s scheme to engineer him out of the supply chain by
learning his skills and killing him. His work-life balance is complicated by
his reluctance to tell his wife he has become a meth dealer.
The big lie, and the hubris
Yet these are twists on
common themes. The breakdown of relations between business partners, thanks to
the acids of ego, greed and paranoia, is a perennial business problem: think of
the tension between Michael Eisner and Michael Ovitz at Disney or the noisy
implosions of the Beatles or dozens of other pop groups. Strained relations
between companies and distributors are common: in one survey 80% of executives
said that they had worries about “exclusivity, control and resource
protection”. In one of his books Mr Christensen notes that whenever he has
attended a university reunion he was struck by how many of his contemporaries
suffered from terrible work-life balance: “Their personal relationships had
begun to deteriorate, even as their professional prospects blossomed.” Mr White
is even typical in telling himself the “big lie” that he is doing everything he
does for his family.
Mr White’s biggest
failing is also a common one in business: hubris. The more successful he
becomes, the more invulnerable he feels. The more rules he breaks, the more
righteous he feels. And the more wealth he accumulates, the more he wants. An
impressive volume of social-science studies suggests that leaders are more
willing to break the rules than followers. There is no shortage of corporate
examples, from Enron to Olympus , to illustrate
this. Walter White is a thoroughly odd character: Mr Chips turned Scarface, as
the show’s creator, Vince Gilligan, puts it. But he also holds a worrying
mirror to the business world.
No comments:
Post a Comment